<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free captioning of YouTube videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inclusive.com/2009/01/free-captioning-of-youtube-videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inclusive.com/2009/01/free-captioning-of-youtube-videos/</link>
	<description>More accessibility, for more access</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jean Wells</title>
		<link>http://inclusive.com/2009/01/free-captioning-of-youtube-videos/#comment-38254</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inclusive.com/?p=88#comment-38254</guid>
		<description>I actually tried this out... I had a 3 minute YouTube video and the accuracy of Subply was less than 50%.  The plus, is that you get a 50% start on editing for free but I think a live transcriber for $3 and 99% accuracy is a better deal.  I couldn't edit this Subply document for less than $30 on my student assistants salary ($10/hr).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually tried this out&#8230; I had a 3 minute YouTube video and the accuracy of Subply was less than 50%.  The plus, is that you get a 50% start on editing for free but I think a live transcriber for $3 and 99% accuracy is a better deal.  I couldn&#8217;t edit this Subply document for less than $30 on my student assistants salary ($10/hr).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
