We’re here to help you develop, market, or purchase accessible and usable products — products that work better for everyone because they’re easy to use.

Inclusive Technologies provides a full range of consulting services to companies, public agencies, consumers, researchers, purchasers, and policy makers on how products can better meet the needs of all users, including users with disabilities and elders.

Contact us by email (info AT inclusive DOT com) or phone (+1.908.907.2387)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

I watched Clint Eastwood’s “Gran Torino” last night.  For those who haven’t seen the movie, Clint plays an aging bigot in a shifting neighborhood who gets caught up in gang violence after his wife’s death.  Clint’s crusty persona sprays bitter contempt onto the changing world around him as his own health fails.

There’s a scene with his son and daughter-in-law on his birthday that stayed on my mind.  They arrive with presents: a reacher and a big-button phone.  Needless to say, Clint does not express his appreciation; his subsonic growl builds as they cautiously suggest moving to an assisted living facility.  We don’t get to see Clint’s explosion, but we do see the pair hurriedly leaving in exasperation at their own attempt to reach out to him.

My first reaction, of course, was “Thanks, Eastwood, you dipstick, for thoughtlessly stigmatizing accessibility and usability to score shallow cinematic points!  Just what the world needs, another portrayal of comfort and convenience as sissified and demeaning.”  I slept the righteous sleep of the professionally self-justified.

I awoke less so.  People on the receiving end of our beneficence *do* have reactions of reluctance, resistance, and rejection.  Are they all dysfunctional fools, or are they just paying resentful attention to the social markers invisibly embossed on every manufactured object?  If an upscale watch means “I’m stylish and rich”, what does a reacher mean?  And what does giving someone a reacher mean?

When “practitioners” look at a reacher we see an elegant interaction between the sophisticated, painstaking domains of clinical insight and design excellence, and we’re right.  It’s just that someone else looking at it sees a prop for a tragedy, and they’re right, too.

I’m sure we’re all doing as much as we can to trim the stigmatic overtones from highly usable and assistive products, and I wouldn’t want anyone to slack off because those efforts are not always rewarded with elder-glee.  But I think we’d better pay more attention to how the recipient views the exchange.  Sometimes it’s not the chrome-plated heart of the gadget I can’t do without; it’s the chrome-plated face on the dipstick who gives it to me.

There’s a new Swedish site that has collected hundreds of simple, mostly low-tech tips for independent living, arranged by category and degree of disability.  Go visit and suggest your own!

Spinalstips - Tips och ideas for people with spinal cord injuries (SCI)

Posted in News | No Comments »

SubPLY promises to caption your YouTube videos for free.  Leaving aside the sustainability of that business model, their willingness to step into this void is much appreciated.  FCC regulations require captioning for broadcast video, but leave Internet video alone (for now).  This has created a growing gap as online video becomes more ubiquitous, useful and unique.

Although some regulation of online distribution will probably arrive sometime, it’ll probably only cover large-market, for-profit content that’s similar to what’s broadcast now.  It’s unlikely that you’ll ever be forced to caption the funny things your kids say at family reunions.

Jared’s Global Microbrand » Blog Archive » SubPLY offering free captioning of YouTube video clips

Posted in News | 1 Comment »

Google just upgraded its Accessible View experimental search version.  The new one shows up in large print, with sound alerts, keyboard navigation, and screen reader compatibility.

In Brief: Google Upgrades Accessible Search

Getting the word out

October 30th, 2008

Do-it-yourselfers know Instructables as a great online resource of well-documented, practical projects, and a wide, wise dialogue about them.  A recent project took an IKEA crib and modified it for a small-stature parent, using the expert guidance of Judi Rogers of Berkeley’s Through the Looking Glass.  Look at the multiplier effect on accessibility awareness when a mainstream site with giant traffic stats picks up our message.  Join the Instructables Assistive Technology Group and share your savvy!

MAKE: Blog: Crib Modification for Accessibility

Fernando Botelho in MAKE magazine challenges us to build a $200 talking computer for blind kids: makezine.com: Let There Be Speech.

We all agree with the goal, but what’s the best way to achieve it?  Is this really a technological problem, or is it an organizational and distributional one?  Anyone who’s visited one of the assistive technology conferences knows that we’ve got the technological answers to almost all the accessibility problems we face.  Where we fail — and we really are failing — is in getting those solutions into the hands of the people they were intended to benefit.  Price can be a barrier, but so can lack of awareness or confidence, and poor implementation and support networks.

An alternative approach is not to build any new hardware, but to piggyback on existing hardware and technical support networks that are succeeding at the tough task of massive global adoption.  This means “infiltrating” the wireless phone and One Laptop Per Child ecosystems.  It means finding all the existing channels for communicating about accessibility solutions, and amplifying our message there.  We may be able to do more good per dollar with an accessibility how-to poster in every Internet cafe in the developing world than a technology-driven development project.

Making accommodations work

October 26th, 2008

Take a look at this college student’s experience of accessibility and accommodations:

Technology: A Love-Hate Story | Tania Says

So many of the problems arise from implementation rather than the “raw” accessibility in the products or environment:

  • C-Print can only be used on “special” devices
  • these devices require AC current, which is only available at the back of a large lecture hall
  • transcriptionist scheduling
  • speakers with strong accents
  • insufficient training for teachers on accessibility and accommodations
  • unreliable wireless connections
  • incorrect (or unexpected) routing for audio
  • classes held in disadvantageous environments such as darkrooms

Accessibility is a lab course!

Campaign Ad for Tom Udall

October 16th, 2008

No matter where you stand politically, this campaign ad video shows the real-life, everyday need for more and better accessible technology.

A new password security utility hides what the user enters with an on-screen keyboard that redraws itself too frequently for “keylogging” programs to grab.  But there are 2 problems: the on-screen keyboard flashes in a way that might cause seizures, and there seems to be no keyboard alternative, excluding most blind and some dexterity impaired users.  Both of these features would currently fail Section 508, the regulations for federal ICT procurement.

As with biometrics, security and accessibility collide here.

Keyloggers beaten by new crypto utility | InfoWorld | News | 2008-09-15 | By John E. Dunn, Techworld

Posted in News | No Comments »